The recent inquest seems to point the finger at an accident.

Oh so we would like to believe.

But let’s look at some very fishy facts that remain unsolved.

- the car was not meant to be in the tunnel.  The car should have followed another route other than the tunnel.

- witnesses report the driver did not appear drunk or smell of alcohol.

- a fragment of a Fiat car was found in the tunnel.  It was in fact a piece of car that match a car driven by a famous French papparazi photographer.  The car was later tracked down to a scrap yard.  Meanwhile, some years later, the paparazzi allegeded owner of the car was found burned alive in his car, suicide apparently.  SUSPICIOUS!  An arrogant French paparazzi psyche would be of a person who cares about himself only.  Suicide would not be on the cards.  Drugging someone, then burning them in a car would destroy any evidence of drugs etc.

Sadly, there is little other evidence.

My thoughts are this

- the driver was told to drive to the tunnel.  

- a motorbike which looked like parparazzi was waiting, it got in front of the Mercedes and used a high power flash to blind the driver, who then crashed.  Perfect accident.

OR

- the driver was paid by the French paparazzi in the Fiat to go to the tunnel so he may photograph and follow.

- the Fiat and Mercedes collide, the Mercedes crashes.

I’d like to believe the 2nd story but since the paparazzi died in suspicous circumstances, I don’t believe it.